Time of onset and factors associated with delayed response post intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin a in patients with neurogenic and idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for delayed response in patients with neurogenic and idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin A injection. Subjects and Methods: This is a retrospective study that included 87 patients who underwent onabotulinumtoxin A intradetrusor injection from October 2011 to November 2019. Patients were followed up at 2, 4, and 12 weeks post intervention in the outpatient clinic and over the phone. The data of patients with early response were compared with those with late response using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The study included 87 patients. The mean age was 41 ± 15.3 standard deviation, and 69% of the participants were female. Fifty-one percent were diagnosed with neurogenic OAB. A median response time to onabotulinumtoxin A injection of 7 days was demonstrated, and patients who responded during the first 7 days post procedure were considered early responders. Independent predictors for late response include diabetes (Relative risk: 3.89, P = 0.018, and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-11.98), >1 BTX-A session (Relative risk: 4, P = 0.011, and 95% CI: 1.38-11.6), and wet OAB (RR: 9.94, P = 0.002, and 95% CI: 2.31-42.17). Conclusions: The median time of onset post intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A was found to be 7 days. Diabetes mellitus, wet OAB, and <1 Botox sessions were independent risk factors for late onset of response.

Multicenter Study for the Effect of COVID-19 Lockdown on Patients With Sacral Neuromodulation Implants.

INTRODUCTION: The massive spread of COVID-19 affected many aspects of medical and surgical services. Many patients with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) devices needed integrated follow-up and close communication regarding the programming of the device. In this study, we aimed to explore the effect of COVID-19 lockdown on patients with SNM devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter study designed and conducted in four centers performing SNM (Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada; King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait; and Austin and Western Health, University of Melbourne, Australia). An online questionnaire was created through Google Forms and circulated among patients with SNM devices in all four mentioned centers. The questionnaire was sent to patients during the forced lockdown period in each country. RESULTS: A total of 162 responses were received by September 2020. Data showed that most patients had their device implanted before the lockdown period (92.5%, 150/162). Most patients did not experience any contact difficulties (91.9%, 149/162). When patients were requested for their preference of programming, 89.5% (145/162) preferred remote programming. Correlation analysis did not show any significant relation between patient diagnosis and COVID-19-related difficulties or preferences. CONCLUSION: The difficulties with access to care experienced during the pandemic and the patient's expressed willingness to participate in virtual care should provide impetus for manufacturers of SNM devices to move forward with developing remote programming capabilities.